Can an execution ever truly be called humane? The question appears contradictory at first. If the ultimate purpose of an execution is to take away a human life, can the State simultaneously claim an obligation to preserve dignity, minimise suffering and ensure a civilised death? Yet this is precisely the legal and moral dilemma surrounding capital punishment. The debate is no longer confined to whether the death penalty should exist. It has increasingly moved towards a more difficult question: if the State executes a person, what limits does the Constitution place on the manner in which that life may be taken? In India, this question has acquired particular significance because the Constitution protects life and personal liberty under Article 21, while the criminal justice system continues to recognise capital punishment in exceptional circumstances. The Indian position: Death, but with dignity Indian law prescribes hanging as the method of carrying out a death sentence. Th...
For decades, managing high cholesterol has largely meant a familiar routine: daily tablets, periodic injections, dietary changes and regular blood tests. But a new approach is beginning to challenge that model. Scientists are exploring whether a single gene-editing treatment could produce a long-lasting reduction in LDL cholesterol, commonly called “bad cholesterol”. One of the most promising candidates is an experimental therapy known as VERVE-102 , which is designed to alter a specific gene involved in cholesterol regulation. The early results are striking, but they also come with an important caveat: this is still experimental medicine, not an approved replacement for statins or other established cholesterol treatments. Why is LDL cholesterol such a concern? LDL, or low-density lipoprotein, transports cholesterol through the bloodstream. When LDL levels remain high, cholesterol can accumulate within the walls of arteries. Over time, these deposits can contribute to athe...